"No. Jurors deliberated for 20 days, for example, before
acquitting white separatist Randy Weaver and a co-defendant of killing a
federal marshal in a 1992 shootout after a siege at Weaver’s cabin in
Ruby Ridge, Idaho; his wife and son also died in the gunfire. In a
notorious fraud case against former Tyco International Ltd. CEO Dennis
L. Kozlowski and chief financial officer Mark Swartz, a Manhattan jury
was entering its 12th day of deliberations in 2004 when a judge declared
a mistrial after one juror reported getting an intimidating letter and
phone call. Deliberations in a retrial the next year went another 11
days before the ex-execs were convicted of looting the company of $600
million. Two separate juries deadlocked after more than 18 days of
debating the murder case against Lyle and Erik Menendez, two brothers
accused of killing their parents in their mansion in Beverly Hills,
California (a mistrial was declared in Erik’s case in the 19th day and
Lyle’s on the 25th day, after the January 1994 Northridge earthquake
halted deliberations for four days). Ultimately, both brothers were
convicted after 20 days of deliberation in a 1996 retrial. After
three former Oakland, California, police officers were accused of
beating and framing suspects and falsifying reports, jurors deliberated
for 56 days in 2003 before deadlocking on most counts and acquitting on
several others. Deliberations in a 2005 retrial spanned more than a
month before a jury again deadlocked on most counts and acquitted on
others. Prosecutors decided against a third trial for the ex-officers,
who called themselves the “Riders.” Civil courts have seen some
even more epic deliberations. A federal jury deliberated on and off for
more than four months in 2004 before finding for a mother and son who
sued Long Beach, California, for refusing to let them convert homes into
residences for Alzheimer’s disease patients.
http://www.courierpostonline.com/story/news/local/south-jersey/2015/05/06/patz-jury-deadlock/70887206/