https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28291-expert-witness-on-shaken-baby-syndrome-faces-misconduct-charge/
Tuesday, October 6, 2015
Bulletin: Dr. Waney Squier U.K. " Expert witness on “shaken baby syndrome” faces misconduct charge." Daily Mail. "The hearing began yesterday and is expected to last six months. Squier has not spoken publicly about the hearing, but other pathologists have described the case as a “witch hunt” aimed at preventing her appearing as an expert witness in future."..."The GMC would not disclose its reasons for pursuing the case against Squier, but transcripts of a talk in 2010 at the Eleventh International Conference on Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma in Atlanta, Georgia, by Detective Inspector Colin Welsh of the Metropolitan Police reveal the Met’s deep frustration at losing child abuse cases, listing defence expert witness testimony as the “top of the list” of reasons for losses in 2008 and 2009." (Publisher's Note: (Editorial): What a despicable, ignorant gangup. The medical regulator working hand in hand with the police to ensure that scientists like Waney Squier - armed with the latest in scientific research do not get in the way of convictions of innocent parents and caregivers. Justice be damned. A shameful, heartless, self-serving display of vindictiveness by both the regulator and the police. Bon courage Dr. Squier). Harold Levy. Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog."
"A senior British pathologist whose research has identified innocent
causes for symptoms previously thought to be caused solely by child
abuse is facing a disciplinary hearing over her work. The charges relate
to her role as an expert witness in court cases involving
non-accidental head injury (NAHI), formerly known as “shaken-baby
syndrome”. Waney Squier,
a consultant neuropathologist at the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford,
is the second “shaken baby” expert witness in five years to be called
before the UK General Medical Council. Marta Cohen, a pathologist at
Sheffield Children’s Hospital, was summoned in 2010 and later cleared of any wrongdoing. Squier appeared as an expert witness in several court cases between
2007 and 2010 involving allegations of NAHI. She is one of several
researchers worldwide who have challenged a long-standing assumption in
such cases: that a triad of symptoms – haemorrhages on the surface of
the brain, haemorrhages in the retinas, and a swollen brain – is
unequivocal evidence of abusive behaviour. Through their research on the brains of dead infants, Squier and her colleagues have discovered that these symptoms can occur through innocent causes, including difficulty breathing and infections. Squier is now being brought before the UK General Medical Council’s fitness to practise panel. The summary of her charges
alleges she gave evidence outside her field of expertise, failed to be
objective and unbiased when delivering evidence in court, and failed to
pay “due regard to the views of other experts”. “It is alleged that Dr Squier’s actions were misleading,
irresponsible, deliberately misleading, dishonest, and were likely to
bring the reputation of the medical profession into disrepute,” says the
summary. The hearing began yesterday and is expected to last six
months. Squier has not spoken publicly about the hearing, but other pathologists have described the case as a “witch hunt” aimed at preventing her appearing as an expert witness in future. The GMC would not disclose its reasons for pursuing the case against Squier, but transcripts of a talk in 2010 at the Eleventh International Conference on Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma in Atlanta, Georgia, by Detective Inspector Colin Welsh of the Metropolitan Police reveal the Met’s deep frustration at losing child abuse cases, listing defence expert witness testimony as the “top of the list” of reasons for losses in 2008 and 2009. A spokeswoman for the Metropolitan Police said this week that
following a high-profile acquittal of a defendant in a “shaken baby”
case in 2008, prosecution bodies met with the Metropolitan Police to
discuss how to manage the impact of contradictory expert witness
evidence. Following these discussions, a now-defunct body called the
National Policing Improvement Agency sent a report “regarding two
doctors” to the GMC. “The Metropolitan Police Service cooperated with a request from the
GMC in June 2010 to provide any relevant information,” said the
spokeswoman.""
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28291-expert-witness-on-shaken-baby-syndrome-faces-misconduct-charge/
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28291-expert-witness-on-shaken-baby-syndrome-faces-misconduct-charge/