Bite mark evidence that was key to Mississippi death row inmate Eddie
Lee Howard's conviction has been roundly discredited, his attorneys told
the state's Supreme Court on Tuesday. Howard is seeking a new trial for his conviction on raping and killing a Lowndes County woman in 1992. Attorney
Tucker Carrington with the Mississippi Innocence Project argued to the
court that new information since Howard's trial shows the scientific
community has rejected the methodology and conclusions forensic dentist
Dr. Michael West of Hattiesburg reached in Howard's case. "To look back at Dr. West's findings, I don't think he has ever been right," Carrington said. Special
Assistant Attorney General Jason L. Davis told the justices that before
they toss out Howard's conviction it would be better to conduct a
hearing into how bite mark evidence is now viewed by the medical
community. Justices questioned both sides on changes in the acceptability of the bite mark evidence since Howard's conviction in 2000. The
issues include a 2013 action by the American Board of Forensic
Odontology, the only entity that certifies and oversees bite mark
analysts, to change its guidelines to bar such testimony. In 2009, a
National Academy of Sciences report found no scientific basis for
concluding that a bite mark could identify a single suspect. In a 2012
deposition, West said he no longer believes in bite-mark analysis.........Howard, now 61, was convicted and sentenced to death
in the slaying of 82-year-old Georgia Kemp of Columbus. Evidence against
him included bite marks on her body. West testified they matched
impressions of Howard's teeth."
http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/story/news/crime/2015/06/23/bite-marks-evidence-appeal/29183765/