Bite mark evidence that was key to Mississippi death row inmate Eddie 
Lee Howard's conviction has been roundly discredited, his attorneys told
 the state's Supreme Court on Tuesday. Howard is seeking a new trial for his conviction on raping and killing a Lowndes County woman in 1992. Attorney
 Tucker Carrington with the Mississippi Innocence Project argued to the 
court that new information since Howard's trial shows the scientific 
community has rejected the methodology and conclusions forensic dentist 
Dr. Michael West of Hattiesburg reached in Howard's case. "To look back at Dr. West's findings, I don't think he has ever been right," Carrington said. Special
 Assistant Attorney General Jason L. Davis told the justices that before
 they toss out Howard's conviction it would be better to conduct a 
hearing into how bite mark evidence is now viewed by the medical 
community. Justices questioned both sides on changes in the acceptability of the bite mark evidence since Howard's conviction in 2000. The
 issues include a 2013 action by the American Board of Forensic 
Odontology, the only entity that certifies and oversees bite mark 
analysts, to change its guidelines to bar such testimony. In 2009, a 
National Academy of Sciences report found no scientific basis for 
concluding that a bite mark could identify a single suspect. In a 2012 
deposition, West said he no longer believes in bite-mark analysis.........Howard, now 61, was convicted and sentenced to death 
in the slaying of 82-year-old Georgia Kemp of Columbus. Evidence against
 him included bite marks on her body. West testified they matched 
impressions of Howard's teeth."
http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/story/news/crime/2015/06/23/bite-marks-evidence-appeal/29183765/
