The state’s highest court ruled Thursday that judges must instruct
jurors that eyewitnesses may have greater difficulty accurately
identifying somone who is not their own race, unless both prosecution
and defense agree that it’s not an issue. “In criminal trials
that commence after the issuance of this opinion, a cross-racial
instruction should always be included when giving the model eyewitness
identification instruction, unless the parties agree that there was no
cross-racial identification,” the court ruled in an opinion written by
Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice Ralph Gants. The court had already ruled that the instruction should be given when
“warranted by the evidence” and when the “witness and offender are of
different races.” But the court said it had not previously defined
what evidence was necessary and who, if anyone, should decide whether
the witness and the person identified were of different races. Noting
that the concept of race is “notoriously unclear,” the court settled on
generally requiring the instruction, unless both sides agree it’s not
part of the case..........The
court, ruling in the case, Commonwealth v. Elvin Bastaldo, said that
the “cross-race effect ... has reached a near consensus in the relevant
scientific community and has been recognized by courts and scholars
alike. We remain convinced that jurors who are asked to evaluate the
accuracy of an identification should be informed” of the effect."
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/06/25/high-court-requires-judges-instruct-juries-that-cross-racial-identification-can-flawed/2vBrsgqcyNY4p35pREA3IO/story.html
See related Innocence Project post at:
http://www.innocenceproject.org/news-events-exonerations/massachusetts-high-court-to-inform-jurors-about-risk-of-cross-racial-misidentificationsthe-massachusetts-criminal-justice-system-made-a-significant-step-toward-preventing-wrongful-convictions-last-week-the-state2019s-supreme-judicial-court-announced-that