"New York officials say they're eliminating cash bail for thousands
of New Yorkers accused of misdemeanour and non-violent felonies in an
effort to divert them from the Rikers Island jail complex. An
$18-million plan to be unveiled Wednesday will allow judges to instead
require that people accused of certain crimes be monitored while they
wait for their trial. Meanwhile, several states and cities across the
U.S. are looking to adopt a computer program aimed at eliminating bias
in assessing who qualifies for bail......... In 2013,
Kentucky courts began to use a novel computer program, the Public Safety
Assessment-Court, that crunches data about each defendant and more than
a million previous cases to predict whether the defendant poses a high
risk of committing new crimes or skipping out on court dates. The program, (defence lawyer) Popplewell said, gave her clients
good scores on both counts. The judges, persuaded, set affordable bail.
The men went home, and they didn’t cause problems. Science has no role in most U.S. bail
decisions. Judges rely on intuition to decide who goes free and who does
not. Critics say the system is rife with bias against blacks, Hispanics
and the poor. And low-risk inmates crowd local jails, either unable to
afford bail or denied bail by guessing judges who chose to err on the
side of public safety. Facing ballooning costs and mounting
complaints, governments around the country are clamouring for a better
way. Some are turning to data. More than 20 cities and states will soon adopt the computer program used in Kentucky. “We felt strongly that the way were doing it
wasn’t working, because we weren’t getting adequate information to the
judges,” said Harold Delia, a court official in the state of
Washington’s Yakima County, which will begin using the program later in
the year. “It was pretty arbitrary. It was based on what judge you saw
and what information was provided by the prosecutor or public defender.
It wasn’t what I would call evidence-based.” The national movement for evidence-based reform has been accelerated by the New York City case of Kalief Browder,
a teenager who spent three years in jail on Rikers Island because he
couldn’t afford the $3,000 bail for allegedly stealing a backpack. He
later killed himself. On Wednesday, Mayor Bill de Blasio announced an $18-million plan
to make greater use of pre-trial supervision in place of bail. De
Blasio said 3,000 more people will be kept out of jail. It is
“unacceptable,” he said in a statement, for people to be imprisoned
“based on the size of their bank account.” “A huge step in the right direction,” said Peter Goldberg, executive director of the Brooklyn Community Bail Fund.
But he said the changes do not go nearly far enough. If the city wants
real fairness, Goldberg said, the practice of sending people to jail
because they don’t have the ability to pay should be entirely forbidden. De Blasio said the city will start to use a
“validated” risk assessment tool. The tool used in Kentucky was
developed by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, an organization
attempting to use evidence to improve the justice system. Its algorithm
considers nine pieces of information. Among them: the defendant’s age,
current charge, and history of crime. Not among them: race. Employment status and addiction history are
also excluded. Arnold’s research found these factors, often taken into
account by judges, don’t actually make a difference. In Charlotte, an early adopter of the Arnold
system, the jail population has dropped sharply. The new adopters
include Chicago, Pittsburgh and the state of New Jersey. In Yakima,
Delia said, the 12 local judges plan to only rarely exercise their power
to reject the release-or-not recommendations the Arnold program spits
out. They are confident, he said, that the software will make good calls.""
Their god is not willing, Penny
5 hours ago
